Reportage par un journaliste du Times sur le débat Royal-Sarkozy du 3 mai 2007 (Patronage laïque, Paris 15ème)

Publié le par François Alex

 

The atmosphere was feverish as dozens of Socialist Party supporters gathered last night in a well-heeled district of south Paris to listen to the presidential debate.

They cheered as Ségolène Royal attacked Nicolas Sarkozy, booed as he defended himself and groaned as he demanded precise facts and figures from her.

But on an old blue sofa in a corner of the theatre hired by the party, Matthieu Gaulet bit the edge of a plastic cup in silence.

“She’s too aggressive,” said the 22-year-old floating voter, who was accompanying Socialist friends. “I don’t know whether I’ll vote on Sunday and I’m not sure whether this debate is doing anything to convince me to do so.”

He slumped back down and threw back his head as he listened to an antagonistic exchange over the financing of the French state pension system.

“Frankly, this is not very interesting,” Mr Gaulet said.

“They are both boring me.” No one else in the cramped, overheated theatre dared to voice similar opinions. “I think Ségolène Royal is good,” said Lucie Berges, a 25-year-old law student. “She is relaxed and on the attack. It’s going well.”

Civil servant Valérie Vauquelin, 39, agreed. “She is really audacious and I admire her.”

But behind the facade lay a concern that became increasingly tangible as the evening wore on: Ms Royal’s supporters praised her for resisting and landing some punches, but not the knockout blow that they said she needed.

Some even admitted that Mr Sarkozy, seeking throughout to appear calm and in control of his notoriously jumpy nerves, had got the better of her.

François Stofft, a 47-year-old aeronautical engineer said: “Sarkozy is very cunning. He has been pinching her ideas and vocabulary all the way. He’s mastering his nerves rather better than she is.”

Mr Stofft had been hoping that the centre-right candidate would blunder. But after an hour of heated exchanges, that hope was fading.

Suddenly a huge cheer went up when Ms Royal launched a violent attack on her adversary, accusing him of immorality over his policy on handicapped children.

But the cheer swiftly died away as Mr Sarkozy neatly side-stepped with a counter accusation that she had lost her nerves. “He scored a point,” a middle-aged man said.

François Gausegonzac, a 61-year-old pensioner, said: “Sarkozy is not doing too badly and I have to say that she has not managed to destabilise him.

“After the first round of the election I was almost certain that Sarkozy would win; now I am a little more optimistic but the opinion polls have not moved in our favour and I am not sure this debate will change very much.”

Thierry Currivand, 45, a management consultant, felt that Ms Royal had begun badly. “She was tense and she obviously had stage fright.” He agreed that Mrs Royal had appeared aggressive but said that she had also seemed natural. And that might touch voters.

Could Ms Royal win on Sunday? Mr Currivand reflected: “It would be a surprise, a very big surprise but, you know, the French rugby team is never as good as when everyone expects it to lose. The same thing is true of voters in this country. They like producing surprises.”

Calm? I am!

 

Sarkozy “Calm down, don’t point at me with your finger like that”

Royal “No, I won’t calm down”

Sarkozy “To be president you have to be calm”

Royal “Not when there is injustice. There is anger that is perfectly healthy . . . I won’t allow the immorality of political speeches to gain the upper hand”

Sarkozy “I don’t know why Madame Royal, who is usually calm, has lost her cool”

Royal “I have not lost my cool, I’m angry. It’s not the same. Don’t be contemptuous”

Sarkozy “I am not calling into question your sincerity, Madame Royal. Don’t call into question my morality. And with that, Madame, the dignity of the presidential debate will be preserved”

 

From

May 3, 2007

 
 
 

 

 
 

Sarkozy's politic is : rich people will be richer and richer and poor people will be poorest and poorest.
is it a good politic? I don't think. Our country need a politic witch help banlieues and poor people to get a job and to have dreams for the future. I don't say that Ségolène Royal will be the best president to applicate this politic but Sarkozy is absolutely not the president that we need to grew in good conditions. (sorry for my english)

 

Nathalie, Cherbourg, France

 

Sego seemed really convincing for me.
She proved that she's stronger than people though.
Will it be enough to win on Sunday ? I'm note so sure..

 

Mat, LONDON, UK

 

What a Muppet Show !

 

Thomas Ernst, Nyon, Switzerland

 

Monsieur SARKOZY is the only one who can wake up our country ! We don't want any more old politicians and socialists. Some of them are very bright and I fully respect their ideas. Nevertheless Royal is dangerous : she is the result of a amazing marketing strategy. Unfortunately for her, the debate has shown her real nature : no argumentation, no economical strategy, very vague on the mains topics, and so agressive...
Sarkozy (I will vote for him) was OK but not as good as I was expecting. Perahp's he was avoiding a mistake... But he really deceives me on the social topics... But, in face of Royal, he is the best to drive or country and develop our old our socialist economy.

 

Vincent L., Paris, France

 

I think I will vote but it is not easy to decide. Mr Sarkozy was not nervous but he was aggressive and It is not a quality for a president... that is why if I vote It will not be for Sarkozy... we will see it sunday

 

Nathalie, Cherbourg, FRANCE

 

Mr Sarkozy was ahead and needed 1 thing : not to lose his temper. And so he did.
Mrs Royal was behind and needed 2 things: show her consistency, and so she did, and prove more controlled than Sarkozy, and there she failed.

 

bernard, paris, france

 

The true personality of Mrs Royal, had'nt you been aware of it before, appeared full scale during "the" debate. She is still too vague when exposing her ideas, she blends up all the different subjects, she ignores the proposed plan of the journalists to organise the different topics of the debate. She showed that she has no method whatsoever, and it looks like a bad sign for the job of president. A tough cookie, she sure is, but this doesn't make her competent, as once was a Maggie Thatcher in GB. Mr Sarkozy masters all his files and dossiers, he showed us that he can remain collected under attack, he repeated his determination to get the results he committed himself to, and he seems to me that he is in a position to succeed.

 

Michel LE QUANG, Vic la Gardiole, FRANCE

 

I shall not vote

 

Michael, Cahagnes, France

 

Publié dans BIG BANG

Pour être informé des derniers articles, inscrivez vous :

Commenter cet article